The Safe System treatment hierarchy helps you prioritise the most effective treatments.
Each treatment shows how to improve safety by reducing exposure (E), likelihood (L) and severity (S). For example, if the risk assessment indicates a high likelihood of a crash happening, the priority should be to use treatments that will decrease the likelihood.
Consider combining 2 or more treatments where risks are high for multiple crash types (as is often the case).
The table below shows the hierarchy of potential treatments to reduce the risks of a driver being run off the road by another driver, and the severity of the results if this does occur.
Run-off-road (to left or right) treatments
Hierarchy |
Treatment |
Influence
E = Exposure
L = Likelihood
S = Severity |
Safe System options ('primary' or 'transformational' treatments |
- Flexible roadside and median barriers (or equally/better performing future equivalent)
- Very high quality compacted roadside surface, very gentle to flat side slopes and exceptionally wide run-off areas
- Very low speed environment/speed limit
|
S
S
LS
|
Supporting treatments that move towards better Safe System alignment (compatible with future implementation of Safe System options) |
- Wide run-off areas with well maintained shallow drainage and gentle side slopes
- Wide sealed shoulders with audio-tactile edgeline
- Lower speed limit
|
S
L
L, S
|
Supporting treatments (does not affect future implementation of Safe System options) |
- Non-flexible safety barrier
- Consistent design along the route (i.e. not out-of-context curves)
- Consistent delineation for route
- Skid resistance improvement
- Improved superelevation
- Audio-tactile centreline
- Audio-tactile edgeline
- Vehicle activated signs
|
S
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
|
Other considerations |
- Speed enforcement
- Rest area provision
- Lane marking compatible with in-vehicle lane-keeping technology
|
L, S
L
L
|
Source: Safe System Assessment Framework, AP-R509-16, Austroads, 2016